Posted by
m0t0r1zed on Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:25:58 AM
Bush the Idiot
People have talked about peace in the Middle East forever. Talk talk talk. Oh, it's so sad. Talk talk talk. Finally, somebody actually did something about it, and what was the reaction?
Bush the Idiot, the uncultured Neanderthal, shows his stupidity by trying to establish peace in the Middle East by killing tyrants and blowing up terrorists!
What a simpleton!
Everyone knows that the way to peace is by talking. A lot. That's the way it's been done in the past and will be in the future. Speechify in the UN. Get all the world leaders together. Have heartfelt conversations. Reach mutual understandings. Get a big rock concert for peace. Everyone around the world will hold their hands in a great symbol of unity. Design a neat logo for a pin that people can wear.
That is the way to achieve peace.
You're not supposed to establish peace by pummelling the dictators and terrorists! Haven't you considered the weighty issue of ethical and moral equivalency? You're doing it wrong, foo!
Violence begets violence. You can't put a fire out with fire (unless it's a giant explosion that snuffs it out, but don't let facts interfere with a good stream of cliches and old adages). War! What is it good for? Uh! Absolutely nuthin! Say it again!
There is supposed to be spontaneous, non-violent protests. Grassroots movements. Woodstock. Massive media coverage. And then the dictators seeing the power of the people and shamed by the error of their ways will yield power. Just like in China. Err, ok. That didn't quite work out, but you get the idea.
bzzt. channel change.
War is nasty and horrible, but it changes things really quickly. Bush didn't want to wait for democracy and love to spontaneously bloom in the Middle East. He saw the direction that the Middle East was heading, and if you payed attention, you'd realize that Bush was sure that it would end in a mushroom cloud.
Yes, even monkeys dream. And I suspect that Smirky the Chimp did have dreams after 9-11. The kind of dreams that when we wake up from, we eventually forget, but for a President ...
Meh, maybe I give the guy too much slack. He made a lot of mistakes, but I think he did a lot of important work. Most importantly, he managed to turn around a war that had been going badly. But enough about Bush, let's talk about ...
Obama the Plastic Man
People try to paint Obama as a leftist extremist. Now, he is definitely a leftist, but I would say that he is a pragmatist first - much like the Clintons. His shifting views show that he is not so much flexible, as pliable. If he is pushed, he bends. He strikes me as a consensus-minded person who wants to get along and be accepted by the majority view, so I don't think he will be able to ram through any radical ideas that the general public will not like.
Unfortunately, this is the same reason why most of the world seems to prefer him over McCain. He's seen as a pushover. The conservative pitbulls instinctively sniff the scent of 'Carter' all over him. Of course, Carter helped facilitate peace between Israel and Egypt, so there are some pro's and con's to this type of person.
Anyhoo, there are many examples of Obama and his camp evincing this behavior over and over again. They ceded their convention to the Clintons. Obama shifted his position on taxes. Obama muddled his opinions on drilling. Obama picked Biden because everyone wanted experience.
Actually, one might think that a notable exception was not putting Hillary in as VP. There was enormous pressure to choose her, but some say that Michelle was adamantly opposed to Hillary. So Obama was balancing angry wife vs. angry Hillaristas. Wife wins.
Obama is like one of those Mr. Stretch toys that you can pull the arms and legs (his ears got stretched too much and won't snap back QQ) and twist him around into a pretzel. McCain seems to be a different story.
McCain the Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Old Guy
McCain is old. And old people scare me. Not because they might suddenly die, since that actually solves the problem by replacing the old guy with a younger person.
The problem is that old people's brains start to suck with age. I guess I'm an ageist or whatever it's called, but it's a biological fact.
I know that some of the ravages of decrepitude can be forestalled by maintaining an active mind. True, true.
However, McCain pulled the old, "There's a lot of good ideas in Washington ..." line. Now, I can excuse a callow neophyte like Obama saying that, but I can't excuse an old geezer like McCain.
The reality is that there's a lot of crappy ideas in Washington that sound good, but when actually implemented won't do jack in solving the problem, or the problem will just shift and eventually adapt around it (cough, cough, McCain-Feingold), and you essentially end up back to square one, but with a lot of wasted time and new regulations.
Now, I want an experienced guy who knows how to pull the right levers, shake the required hands, twist the proper arms, yank the requisite legs, and kick the necessary butts to get things done. However, I also want someone who is smart enough to know how to sort out the crap ideas from the honest-to-goodness, bona fide, decent ideas that actually work when implemented (I'm sure welfare sounded like a noble idea at first, but it also created a horrible societal mess).
Ah well. A lot of what I wrote is snarky and tongue-in-cheek. This isn't always obvious on the Interwebs.