About Me

Name: m0t0r1zed
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

funny column by Ann Coulter

Pretty funny column by Coulter, but it really points out the tactical problems McCain had against Obama. 

The Reign of Lame Falls Mainly on McCain

Hey, not everything McCain did backfired. His careful cultivation of associations with the mainstream media helped him out, right?
 
Ah well, following McCain's pattern of logic ... I suppose McCain will now lead a coalition of moderate Republicans in joining with the Democrats to crush the Conservatives that cost McCain his one chance at the Presidency.  :P
 
I don't want to bust on McCain though ... he seems like a decent fellow, and he did give a good speech.  Unfortunately, giving gracious concession speeches isn't something you want to be remembered for ...
 
Also, I'm not sure if a bona fide conservative would have fared much better, since this election was about electing the first black President and repudiating Bush.  There was a very strong cult of personality surrounding Obama which made him impervious to even the most incendiary scandals that would have vaporized lesser mortals.  It was as if he was wearing a suit made of asbestos or those insulating ceramic tiles on the Space Shuttle.  And Teflon?  Ha!  More like Teflon sprayed down with WD-40 judging by the way nothing would stick to him.  Of course, the media may have had a little something to do with that ...
 
It's going to be pretty interesting observing the media's behavior over the next few years.  Seeing that they've succeeded in their efforts to get Obama elected, they are more likely to push further in the same direction and expand their presence on the Interwebs.
 
edit: also, whenever Obama says "sacrifice," he means taxes.  prepared to be sacrificed.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hugh Hewitt's post-mortem show - comment on way forward

Listened to Hugh Hewitt's post-mortem show.  My views / comments are ... insane as usual.

The First Post-Mortem Show


I never seem to think in lockstep with either Dems or Reps. Prolly since I am neither.

Frankly, all this conservative blather about new strategery, hocus pocus focus group polls, think-tankery, and QQing is pretty lame, unimaginative, and worst of all ... boring.

It's really simple. If conservatism is truly the superior ideology, THEN PROVE IT. ^_^

I would direct aggressive efforts at implementing conservative principles at the state, city, and local levels where Reps are in charge.

Conservative governors, senators, mayors, officials, etc. should form an alliance and work together towards putting the conservative ethos into practice.  Instead of waiting with their hands outstretched for a federal bailout to improve their economies, why won't conservative leaders and officials band together, roll up their sleeves, and tackle the problems themselves? Hmm? Hmm? Hmm?

Really, you're wasting your time at the federal level which is rife with corruption, lobbyists, apparatchiks, and two-legged rodents.  It's a lost cause, imho.

And it's rather sickening hearing Reps whining about how they lost power - as if they don't have enough power already with congressmen, governors, and other elected officials. 

For a party that preaches "limited gov't," conservatives seem to crave a lot of power. Too many overlook the efficacy of a "bottom up" approach. Take what power you have available to you and make the best of it.

The Reps have far more than enough to start a revolution.  So what are you waiting for?

If you're looking for a leader, try Gov. Palin as a possible leader of such a movement, I suppose.

Anyhoo, blah blah blah. whine whine whine.

Tags: Hugh Hewitt  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

my brain is melting ...

it oozed out of my ear and filled a thimble.
o
o
o
\_/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama. Epic. Win.

Hmm, some brief blah blah blah.

1) heck of a win for Obama. A lot of the battleground states were very close, but he pulled through to rack up a decisive electoral margin.  I thought he would win, but badly underestimated his margin of victory.

2) Throughout all of the election coverage, there was genuine pride and excitement beaming in the faces of African-Americans and the young supporters of Obama.  A great moment in American history.

3) The honeymoon period might last longer for Obama since he is the first black President, but I wonder how long it will take before things degenerate back into politics as usual ... after all, these are bureaucratic creatures of habit with their own sense of self-preservation and organizational agendas.  Beware, when you start to tread on the territory of these beasties.

4) Obama does have a trump card, should he encounter problems from the Dems or Reps. Because of his historic presidency, he might be able to use a Reagan tactic and appeal directly to the American people to try to transcend / bypass political obstacles through grassroots momentum.

5) there needs to be a shift from rhetoric to reality.  For example - his foreign policy consisted of nice talking points that would attract voters, but those ideas did not really form a practical or coherent plan.  Again, there are a lot of ideas out there that may sound plausible superficially in a rhetorical vacuum, but in actual practice will fall flat on its face - kinda like that neato Marxism idea.

Overall, both McCain and Obama seem like genuinely decent people.  I just thought that a lot of their ideas sucked.  Hopefully, Obama will succeed in doing what I had hoped Bush would have done ... which was to do very little, not mess things up, and leave people alone by staying the hell out of their business. 

Unfortunately, the circumstances of history made that impossible for Bush.  Hopefully, fate will be kinder to Obama, and his tenure as President will be boring and uneventful.  And I hope that Obama understands that a wise leader isn't one who knows how to rule over the people, but rather, one who knows how to let the people rule themselves.

bleh, what sappy "little grasshopper" pablum, heh.  more likely everyone's gonna go all FDR II on us, lmao. ah well ...

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ignore the National Polls ... sort of

I don't think the national polls are as useful because of the insane numbers Obama's pulling from large Democratic states.
 
 
Illinois +24.7
New York +29.7
Massachusetts +21.3
California +24.4
 
That's pretty damn impressive!  Compare it with what Kerry and Gore got from those same states.
 
Illinois +10.4, +12.0
New York +18.3, +25.0
Massachusetts +25.1, +27.3
California +9.9, +11.8
 
The good news for Republicans is that this probably skews the national polls for Obama by padding it with votes from meaningless, non-battleground states.
 
The good news for Democrats is that this is an indication of a huge wave of support for Obama across the board.  If you look at McCain's state-by-state numbers, they're badly depressed from Bush's numbers in 2000 and 2004.
 
But ultimately, it comes down to the battleground states - and there it's a dogfight.
 
My prediction hasn't changed.  football analogy? wth...  I still think McCain will lose.  He might pick up a few states late, but I think it will go Obama's way, 278-260.
 
So far, the polls seem to point to this exact scenario with Colorado, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and New Mexico all for Obama with +5% or more support.  North Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, and Florida are under 5% support for Obama, and I think they might break late in the evening for McCain after Obama already has reached 270 or has gotten pretty close to it.
 
McCain has a chance by picking off both Colorado and Nevada, or even pulling off an upset by flipping Pennsylvania - though unlikely, imho.  Who knows?  Maybe there might be another month of recount madness if some states are too close to call ... heheheh, wouldn't that be nightmarish fun?  The two-party state will have achieved near perfect equilibrium, lmao.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pirates, Ninjas, and Vikings of the World, UNITE!!!

The time for action is now!  While we idly speak, global warming is ravaging the pirate population and driving them to near extinction.

Global Warming Causes Pirate Population Decrease

Sadly, the comments show a dearth of understanding of the true, underlying mechanism behind the phenomenon.  Though this is often believed, ninjas are NOT the natural enemies of pirates!  They live in completely different habitats!  It is just a meme manufactured on the Interwebs to export Pocky into the West!

The scientifical consensus is that SEA MONSTERS are the natural enemis of pirates! There is overwhelming evidence showing that global warming has unfrozen the sea monsters trapped in ice during the last ice age, and their release into the oceans has decimated the pierat population!

Furthermore, computer models predict a concomitant thawing of fire-breathing dragons, thereby resulting in a positive feedback effect causing even more rapidly melting ice and increases in global temperatures. This will result in a tipping point in the near future where our skies and seas will be dominated by monsters, and our last, best hope for survival will rest in an alliance of ninjas, pirates, and vikings, all led by Beowulf.

I had charts and data showing conclusive proof of this causal link, but they were stolen by industrialist ninja spies too blinded by their capitalist greed to realize what they are doing to our beautiful planet!
 
Note: the original hypothesis was that pirates caused global warming.
 
However, the issue of "what causes what" is irrelevant.  Now is not the time to quibble.  We all agree that the most important thing is that WE MUST DO SOMETHING!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

$700 Billion Social Security Privatization Bailout???

Just a wacky idea.
 
Instead of a bailout, what if you gave the $700 billion to banks to set up retirement accounts for American citizens, i.e. privatized some of the Social Security obligation?  Wouldn't that kill two birds with one stone?
 
1) the future obligation of Social Security payments would be removed for Americans that chose to switch over to privatization (however, the gov't would no longer be able to tax them for it ... so there would be some revenue loss)
2) the banks would be able to lend that money since most people would leave the money in there until retirement
3) Americans would feel much better about the bailout since they'd suddenly have big, fat retirement accounts filled with moolah
 
For example, 7 million Americans x $100,000 = $700 billion
 
Meh. I'm not a fiscal policy wonk so dunno if this idea even makes sense, lol.  or how the actual numbers would work out.  I haven't rly thunk it out, like, ya know?  wuh?  and i dun have figures, statistics, or the desire to actually work the computations and whatnot.  Prolly a stupid ideer. anyhoo ...
 
edit: whud are grammar?
edit2: also, you'd have to watch the banks more carefully since you wouldn't want them going bankrupt AGAIN and wiping out all of the minty fresh, private social security accounts. :P
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

i told u so ...

gee, i didn't see this coming ... -_-

White House tells banks to stop hoarding money
 
 
oh wait, i did.
 
 
so, now you have fed the cancer, and it seeks to grow larger.  brilliant.
 
also, i think the ADHD media is fixated on the most recent, sexy credit crisis and has completely forgotten that the slowdown started over a year ago due to the constricting effect of oil - also created by overleveraged hedge funds / speculators jumping out of housing and into oil and commodities and wreaking havoc to industries, stalling growth in china and india, blah blah blah, and then jumping back out before the stuff hit the fan. wunderbar.
 
i could be wrong (what the heck do i know), but perhaps too much is being attributed to the credit crisis, and most of the current economic bad news have long been in the pipeline.
 
also, i'm not as opposed to assisting companies that got caught up in this chain reaction mess - since they were not direct culprits in creating it.
 
bah, whateva.  why i am wasting time with this garbage that i know little about? 
 
wish my headache would die down. it's been killing me all day.
 
this is a blog, so i can whine randomly about whatever i want. :P
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

abcnews column on media bias

Drudge had a link to an abcnews column by Michael Malone on media bias.

Media's Presidential Bias and Decline
 
neato. my two points

1) as some mentioned in the comments - self-selection. people who choose journalism tend to be populist crusader types who often opine "why isn't gov't doing something about this problem?" and view journalism as an active vehicle for addressing social injustices or inequities. kinda like how marxists prolly don't jump into wall street. this results in more liberals in journalism.

2) i don't think competitive selection forces favor unbiased journalism. slant right and get the conservatives. slant left and get the liberals. add more competition from infotainment and screech monkeys throwing verbal poo at each other.  how can boring, unbiased reporting compete against that? in the future, it might only survive with a small, niche audience.

however, maybe the internet is an x-factor.
 
also ... man, drudge is really going after obama lately.  who's feeding him?
and ... media bias doesn't bug me too much - just as long as most people know upfront what the deal is ...
but ... eventually, people won't even bother with facts and just start making stuff up, i suppose ...
that ... would suck.
Tags: Media bias  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Harris poll: Obama favored over McCain on economy

Results of Harris poll indicate that Obama is preferred over McCain to handle the economy by around 40% to 27%.

Obama seen as better able to handle economic issue than McCain
 
Nothing surprising really.  40% Dems back Obama, Inds think everybody sucks by default, and many Reps still don't like McCain so he pulls only around 27%.  It follows the roughly 40-40-20 Dem-Rep-Ind split that I think exists in the country.  More Inds tho were for Obama - tho I think there many Inds who are reliably Dems and Reps but don't like to admit it, which is why I think it is around 40-40-20, or even 45-45-10-ish.  But that's just a number I'm pulling out of the air.  Not sure what the raw numbers were on actual Dem/Rep/Ind sampling in the Harris Poll. Hmm. Whateva.
 
Actually, you could probably get similar polls with Obama largely favored if you picked certain issues that split the conservatives from McCain.  Questions like, "Do you think xxx will do a good job on global warming?" or "Do you think xxx will do a good job on immigration reform?" etc.  You'd probably get Obama with 40% and McCain around 20-25%.  But just a guess.  And how you phrase the question is also important.
 
Oh yeah, and the poll also shows that Americans blame everybody for the mess.  Gee.  Shocker.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bummer, man. Sucks to be you.

The Trouble with Greenspan

I'm a bit disturbed. Not a surprise. That's my usual mental state.

However, I am particularly disturbed by Greenspan's comments that his fundamental thinking and model of how the business world works were incorrect.

Bummer, man.  Sucks to be you.

I don't know if he is being dumb or deceitful.  Although semi-autonomous actors are acting within their own self-interest, it is only at a local level. 

Hmm, analogy to make things simple.

Cancer.  Cancer arises from our own cells.  It would be in the best interests of the cancer to stop growing before it kills its host - since then the cancer also dies - but it doesn't.  It grows and grows and grows until eventually, everything dies - including itself.

Not rational?  No.  Perfectly rational.  You are looking at the wrong organizational level.  A cancer cell is seeking optimal stability at the cellular level.  Humans are looking at cancer from a multi-cellular, organismal level.  Similarly, we are willing to sicken ourselves with chemotherapy and kill off our own cells so that we survive at the organismal level.  From a purely cellular point of view, I suppose such actions would seem insane.

Interpretations of rational and irrational behavior depend upon the proper level - although everything is fundamentally rational because there is a proper cause and effect for everything.  Another dumb, poorly thought out analogy - a mentally deranged person is irrational at the societal and perhaps at the organismal level, but the biochemistry and genetics of such an individual is perfectly logical and orderly.

But I digress.  Back to Greenspan's comment.  The same universal forces that select for the existence of cancer, also select for similar beasties within our political and economic and military-industrial-infotainment systems.

Anyhoo, I suspect that Greenspan's fundamental flaw was adhering to memes that are widely believed simply because they sound correct.  For example, it is not survival of the fittest that is correct.  It is survival of the relatively stable.  Persistence is valued more than superiority.  To remain is more important than to rule.

Heh, actually, that is why I have so little faith in the existing political system.  Our system selects for people who are maximally adapted for just getting votes and retaining power.  Is it a surprise that Obama's greatest achievement so far is "running a good campaign?"  Is it a surprise that the monetary investment into campaigning keeps rising?  The first thing people start working on after getting elected is how to get re-elected.  It is the perpetual campaign because our system selects for it.

Our Congress is filled with people who are better at simply remaining in power, rather than in actually governing.  The Democratic and Republican parties are simply optimized, vote-getting machines that use people, organizations, and ideological memes to maximize the number of its members in power.

And I can't really blame them.  Although I may blah, blah, blah, whine, whine, whine, and QQ about how lousy they are, they are behaving perfectly rationally.  This is how the system is currently set up to work, and they are simply conforming to the hills and valleys of the political landscape.

But I digress again, and now I'm lost, and I don't know how to return to whatever point I started out making.

Oh wait, I never had one from the beginning.  This is just a blog.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

memes memes memes memes memes ...

memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes
 
 
memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes
 
memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes
 
 
memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saga of the Masters of the Universe

Note: for some reason, it started out as semi-rhyming doggerel, but this was not intended. i subconsciously keep trying to turn it into rhyme, but i ain't gonna waste my time to pen a poem about a bunch of fatheads.

The masters of the universe have all convened due to a crisis of magnitude never before seen. When the masters of the universe tremble should we all not quake and fall to our knees? And pray for the heavens to hear their desperate pleas?

The common man revolves around the world-axis of these Titans and Atlases of industry.  As these epic heroes of capitalism struggle to rally a new order against the Dragon of Chaos, battling at the edge of the economic precipice.  But the common man is too ignorant and stupid and dumb and moronic and imbecilic and pea-brained and dimwitted and dense and shortsighted and obtuse to realize the dire magnitude of the events that are portending - too profound is the saga and scope of interbank lending.

The great center of gravity of the solar system is threatened, and should the Nine Planets of the world of banking fall, our miserable lives and existences as pitiful satellites merely leeching off of their credit-based noblesse oblige will be scattered and flung off into the nether realms.  The planet-gods must be restored!  Their cosmic arcs and cycles must be kept regular and serene.  For by saving them, we save ourselves - the tiny, unworthy moons that we are, who orbit their grand splendour from afar.

Perhaps they may even annoint a new global emperor, a Sun King, to regulate the seven continents and the primeval seas and ...

Aw hell, get over your own sense of self-importance, you stupid b@st@rds.  The world doesn't begin and end with your existence - even though you may think so, and everyone else has been suckered into thinking so too ...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FIX. ECONOMY. SIMPLE.

We've been focusing too much on just the banking system.  We seem to have forgotten that the early slowdown in the global economy was not due to the housing mess and its ripple effects. 

It was oil.

Oil siphoned off trillions of dollars out of the world economy, businesses, and consumers.  The rapidly booming markets in China and India hit walls because of high oil prices.

Although the oil bubble has burst, it is because the world is tanking - as I kinda expected.  The drag effect of high oil prices has sapped the confidence of consumers and was compounded by the credit nonsense.

However, the credit and financial mess has been addressed - imperfectly perhaps, but nonetheless addressed. 

I think we now need to focus on stimulating confidence in the general economy.  One of the ways is by driving down the price of oil.

Every time confidence in the economy improves, oil speculators spike prices back up - essentially driving confidence back down.  We need to obliterate the price of oil and gas.  Nothing will improve consumer confidence more than to see regular back down to around a buck and being able to fill up our gas tanks without wincing.

To drop oil prices, the following should be done.

1) Release the hounds, er, the strategic reserves.
2) Raise interest rates by 1/4 pt. Low rates aren't doing squat anyway.
3) Pass a drilling bill including the highly symbolic ANWR
4) Begin building nukes
5) Pass legislation limiting some types of oil speculation.
6) Push solar, coal, wind, etc. funding, blah blah blah.

Low oil and gas prices will have a strong, positive ripple effect on the world economy - THAT EVERYBODY CAN UNDERSTAND - and doesn't require friggin psychoanalysis and hand holding of bank lending fears.  Stop mucking around with banking reform.

IT'S DAMN SIMPLE. SPIKE OIL AND GAS DOWN FAST. NO RECESSION. THE END. 

Sheesh, we don't need to create a freaking new world global banking system or neo-socialist order to fix the "crisis of confidence" in the world.  There are additional things that could be done to fix the general economy, but I adhere to the principle of KISS, especially since I am simple and stupid.
 
edit:  I view the concepts of living and non-living very differently from most people. A dumb analogy but ... perhaps the world economy could be likened to a living organism and money as its blood.  Ideally, you want the blood to be flowing to where it is most productive and needed.

For example, you always want blood flowing to the brain, heart, and other vital organs.  When thinking, you want an increased blood supply to the brain.  When exercising, you want increased blood flow to the muscles.

Blood is always flowing and changing as it is directed to different regions.  By this analogy, I would say that during the past spike in oil prices, all of the blood in the world economy was flowing towards our a$$.  Yes, we still had blood flowing to our vital organs, but the brain that conjured new innovations and the muscles that powered industry all had a bit of a dropoff in performance.  Recently, I believe that we had a lot of blood dilating our rear end to no great purpose.

And that is my very technical analysis of the world economy. =P

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

why the Brokaw debate was boring ...

BREAKING NEWS!  Most of the submitted questions had to be discarded since they weren't actually questions but were tongue-twisters to give Brokaw a rough time.  And now in business, the economy is in a depression because we say it is.  Back to you, Tom.

Tom:  Thank you. Today's big story:  the financial bailout. A sustainable, fiscal system or the slippery slope of socialism?  But first, Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive